Comments on: Is the Sixth Track the Best? http://www.thecookblog.com/is-the-sixth-track-the-best The personal website of Brian Cook, including posts on art, literature, web, games, soccer, food & drink, travel and music. Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:00:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Jeremy Hetherington-Smythe http://www.thecookblog.com/is-the-sixth-track-the-best/comment-page-1#comment-567 Jeremy Hetherington-Smythe Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:21:02 +0000 http://www.thecookblog.com/is-the-sixth-track-the-best#comment-567 First, the Greatest Hits thing is integral to my disagreement with the overly technophilic nature of this entire post; after the large #6 image, Cook resumes his discussion above with the words "There’s always been a sneaking suspicion in the back of my mind that <b>artists</b> deliberately put strong songs in certain slots", which is a heart-warming touch from a man who is apparently consumed by his need to appear as a heart<b>less</b> and immovable emotional cyclops, one who champions the slow degradation of today's artisans and their dedication to unique pieces of SERIAL expression. What I mean by this is that Cook pays far too much homage to the notion of faceless programmers and mechanised judgement systems than he does to the real animals responsible for putting out the product under discussion here, that is, the humans who are all different in their individual ways, and who may have entered into all kinds of in-studio debate about the order tracks on albums will appear. That he begins his debate's "B-side" above with a reference to "artists", but then falls back into his usual game of not giving much of a rat's ass about the slow decline of art in general, for me betrays an unconscious awareness in the Cook brain of the need for organic seriality, which in music is another way of saying "albums". Historically, albums contained 10 songs, so the mysterious track 6 is strong simply because it is constitutes "Track One of Side Two" and for no other reason. That musicians and in particular producers, have continued to employ this device in the age of the "single sided" CD shouldn't be much of a surprise - after all, when we move from a duality to a singularity it is better to retain as many elements of the duality as possible, in the hope that whatever 4-dimensional complexity was inherent in the former will somehow be transferred to the latter and somehow endow it with an extra chance in life. Life; now there's a word to think about. Albums have for decades, if not hundreds of years, been a theatre that tests a musician's mettle, that dares him or her to offer the world something legendary, something epic and different. Albums are notable for many things, not least of which is their ability to sustain an atmospheric continuum from start to finish, even if that continuum entails huge changeability. Bowie's "Ziggy Stardust", the Flaming Lips' "Yoshimi", and even The Doors' "Soft Parade", that bubblegum-meets-clarinet affair from 1968, all meet this criteria, but when we decide any old wannabe can offer a single track, without that track having to stand as part of a larger entity, we tread strange waters and we must be careful. It is one thing for a great talent to put out a single that simply doesn't appear on any album - such as the Beatles double-A-side "Penny Lane" and "Strawberry Fields" - as long as indeed continue to simultaneously release albums (Sargent Pepper in that instance), but for today's spoiled brats to now be excused not just for copying all that came before - sometimes copying musicians from decades ago - but to now also be allowed to slow-drip their limited talent track by track, because of this wonderful technology, makes things all too easy. It also makes the greats of decades past look not all-too-human, but SUPERHUMAN in comparison. In short, then, track #6 is simply track 1 of Side 2, and Mr. Cook needs to warm up that tough old heart of his and drop his cruel refusal to mourn the passing of humanity's organic spontaneity. Greatest Hits? I shit 'em. First, the Greatest Hits thing is integral to my disagreement with the overly technophilic nature of this entire post; after the large #6 image, Cook resumes his discussion above with the words “There’s always been a sneaking suspicion in the back of my mind that artists deliberately put strong songs in certain slots”, which is a heart-warming touch from a man who is apparently consumed by his need to appear as a heartless and immovable emotional cyclops, one who champions the slow degradation of today’s artisans and their dedication to unique pieces of SERIAL expression. What I mean by this is that Cook pays far too much homage to the notion of faceless programmers and mechanised judgement systems than he does to the real animals responsible for putting out the product under discussion here, that is, the humans who are all different in their individual ways, and who may have entered into all kinds of in-studio debate about the order tracks on albums will appear. That he begins his debate’s “B-side” above with a reference to “artists”, but then falls back into his usual game of not giving much of a rat’s ass about the slow decline of art in general, for me betrays an unconscious awareness in the Cook brain of the need for organic seriality, which in music is another way of saying “albums”.
Historically, albums contained 10 songs, so the mysterious track 6 is strong simply because it is constitutes “Track One of Side Two” and for no other reason. That musicians and in particular producers, have continued to employ this device in the age of the “single sided” CD shouldn’t be much of a surprise – after all, when we move from a duality to a singularity it is better to retain as many elements of the duality as possible, in the hope that whatever 4-dimensional complexity was inherent in the former will somehow be transferred to the latter and somehow endow it with an extra chance in life. Life; now there’s a word to think about.
Albums have for decades, if not hundreds of years, been a theatre that tests a musician’s mettle, that dares him or her to offer the world something legendary, something epic and different. Albums are notable for many things, not least of which is their ability to sustain an atmospheric continuum from start to finish, even if that continuum entails huge changeability. Bowie’s “Ziggy Stardust”, the Flaming Lips’ “Yoshimi”, and even The Doors’ “Soft Parade”, that bubblegum-meets-clarinet affair from 1968, all meet this criteria, but when we decide any old wannabe can offer a single track, without that track having to stand as part of a larger entity, we tread strange waters and we must be careful. It is one thing for a great talent to put out a single that simply doesn’t appear on any album – such as the Beatles double-A-side “Penny Lane” and “Strawberry Fields” – as long as indeed continue to simultaneously release albums (Sargent Pepper in that instance), but for today’s spoiled brats to now be excused not just for copying all that came before – sometimes copying musicians from decades ago – but to now also be allowed to slow-drip their limited talent track by track, because of this wonderful technology, makes things all too easy. It also makes the greats of decades past look not all-too-human, but SUPERHUMAN in comparison.
In short, then, track #6 is simply track 1 of Side 2, and Mr. Cook needs to warm up that tough old heart of his and drop his cruel refusal to mourn the passing of humanity’s organic spontaneity.
Greatest Hits? I shit ‘em.

]]> By: Brian http://www.thecookblog.com/is-the-sixth-track-the-best/comment-page-1#comment-493 Brian Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:41:39 +0000 http://www.thecookblog.com/is-the-sixth-track-the-best#comment-493 Nice list. I particularly like how you kept the formatting the same. Your point about the greatest hits album is well-made, and it's something I considered. However, <em>someone</em> decided that #6 was the best place to put that track, whether or not it was the artist. For that reason, it qualifies for this post. Nice list. I particularly like how you kept the formatting the same. Your point about the greatest hits album is well-made, and it’s something I considered. However, someone decided that #6 was the best place to put that track, whether or not it was the artist. For that reason, it qualifies for this post.

]]> By: Dan Russell http://www.thecookblog.com/is-the-sixth-track-the-best/comment-page-1#comment-488 Dan Russell Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:14:24 +0000 http://www.thecookblog.com/is-the-sixth-track-the-best#comment-488 I once made an iTunes Smart Playlist exclusively of Track 1's. And, although you've already mentioned this about #1's, It featured some great lead-in tone-setting tracks, like these: <a href="http://www.flawlesswalrus.com/01%20Round%20Here.mp3" rel="nofollow">01 Counting Crows - Round Here</a> : August and Everything After <a href="http://www.flawlesswalrus.com/01%20Wine,%20Women,%20and Song.mp3" rel="nofollow">01 Harvey Danger - Wine, Women, and Song</a> : Little by Little <a href="http://www.flawlesswalrus.com/01%20At%20Your%20Funeral.mp3" rel="nofollow">01 Saves the Day - At Your Funeral</a> : Stay What You Are <a href="http://www.flawlesswalrus.com/01%20Common%20People.mp3" rel="nofollow">01 William Shatner - Common People</a> : Has Been <a href="http://www.flawlesswalrus.com/1-01%20American%20Idiot.mp3" rel="nofollow">01 Green Day - American Idiot</a> : American Idiot <a href="http://www.flawlesswalrus.com/01%20Man%20and%20Wife,%20the%20Former.mp3" rel="nofollow">01 Desaparecidos - Man and Wife, the Former</a> : Read Music | Speak Spanish <a href="http://www.flawlesswalrus.com/01%20Tired%20of%20Sex.mp3" rel="nofollow">01 Weezer - Tired of Sex</a> : Pinkerton <a href="http://www.flawlesswalrus.com/01%20This%20is%20a%20Call.mp3" rel="nofollow">01 Foo Fighters - This is a Call</a> : Foo Fighters <a href="http://www.flawlesswalrus.com/01%20The%20World%20is%20New.mp3" rel="nofollow">01 Save Ferris - The World is New</a> : It Means Everything <a href="http://www.flawlesswalrus.com/01%20Waiting%20for%20My%20Ruca.mp3" rel="nofollow">01 Sublime - Waiting for My Ruca</a> : 40oz to Freedom Also, isn't it kind of cheap to use a greatest hits album as evidence of your theory? One would imagine the artist would have little to do with the track ordering of such a disc. I once made an iTunes Smart Playlist exclusively of Track 1’s. And, although you’ve already mentioned this about #1’s, It featured some great lead-in tone-setting tracks, like these:

01 Counting Crows – Round Here : August and Everything After
01 Harvey Danger – Wine, Women, and Song : Little by Little
01 Saves the Day – At Your Funeral : Stay What You Are
01 William Shatner – Common People : Has Been
01 Green Day – American Idiot : American Idiot
01 Desaparecidos – Man and Wife, the Former : Read Music | Speak Spanish
01 Weezer – Tired of Sex : Pinkerton
01 Foo Fighters – This is a Call : Foo Fighters
01 Save Ferris – The World is New : It Means Everything
01 Sublime – Waiting for My Ruca : 40oz to Freedom

Also, isn’t it kind of cheap to use a greatest hits album as evidence of your theory? One would imagine the artist would have little to do with the track ordering of such a disc.

]]>